Homepage


Stop the hate speech!

When you are facing harassment, the best and usual answer is: “do not feed the troll”. It is subject to the fact you are actually facing a troll. However, if your aggressor is a psychopath, silence will not help while the stalker will make everything to get your reputation being trashed thru defamation, calumnious denunciation & bullying. The toxic psychopath taking the control of your public image may result in potential legal and physical consequences for you.

You need to promote your own discourse, to counter the aggressor’s speech and to document the abuses you are facing. Last but not least, you need to make sure you 100% DESTROY the cybercriminal’s ability to lure people.

These are the objectives of this website.

The case at the origins of this website.

Chapursan Valley, analysis of Ms Ramla Akhtar's posts against the Wakhi minority - credibility assessment of alleged conspiracy theories – concerns about imported extremism
Chapursan Valley, analysis of Ms Ramla Akhtar’s posts against the Wakhi minority – credibility assessment of alleged conspiracy theories – concerns about imported extremism

Ramla Akhtar, a woman from karachi, wrote numerous posts about Chapursan Valley. They are contrary to the general opinion. Because Gojal, a region located in the northern mountainous part of Pakistan at the Afghanistan and China corner, is still not an area with a high tourist frequentation. Read more…

Arkives of a cyber stalker

Recent stories


Western states find themselves helpless in the face of online hate speech by nationals of countries located in the gray zone of international law. Their authorities are indifferent to it, or even are the first to resort to it, when they do not encourage them. This is the case with Pakistan. Thus, the cyber-stalker Ramla Akhtar, alias Rmala Aalam, enjoys a complete impunity there for more than two years, while she decided to attack a French citizen. We will detail here all the regular actions that were carried out without success, to finally see that, in this space of lawlessness, the only relevant answer is reciprocity.

PRESS KIT: Pakistani Islamist hate speech and cyberstalking against a Nantes (Fr) citizen

Western states find themselves helpless in the face of online hate speech by nationals of countries located in the gray zone of international law. Their authorities are indifferent to it, or even are the first to resort to it, when they do not encourage them. This is the case with Pakistan. Thus, the cyber-stalker Ramla Akhtar, alias Rmala Aalam, enjoys a complete impunity there for more than two years, while she decided to attack a French citizen. We will detail here all the regular actions that were carried out without success, to finally see that, in this space of lawlessness, the only relevant answer is reciprocity.

PAKISTAN : données clefs des comptes Twitter délictueux de Ramla Akhtar

Les comptes Twitter pakistanais @BestInventoryPR, @CopingWithCovid, @GruaAbuseArkive et @BarefootRaRa se cachent derrière l’anonymat ou des identités usurpées. Ils sont utilisés par Mme Ramla Akhtar de Karachi. Depuis le 18 septembre 2019, ils sont orientés vers les discours de haine, la diffamation, les dénonciations calomnieuses, le chantage, le doxxing ainsi que les appels à la violence.

The Pakistani dark Twitter accounts @BestInventoryPR, @CopingWithCovid, @GruaAbuseArkive, @BarefootRaRa, are “anonymous” and impersonating identities used by Ms Ramla Akhtar from Karachi. Since September 18, 2019, they are oriented towards hate speech, defamation, calumnious denunciations, blackmail, doxxing as well as calls for violences against the Wakhi minority living in northern Pakistan and against western foreigners. As of October 22, 2021, key data evidence their cyber-criminal activity.

PAKISTAN: key data from Ramla Akhtar’s dark Twitter accounts

The Pakistani dark Twitter accounts @BestInventoryPR, @CopingWithCovid, @GruaAbuseArkive, @BarefootRaRa, are “anonymous” and impersonating identities used by Ms Ramla Akhtar from Karachi. Since September 18, 2019, they are oriented towards hate speech, defamation, calumnious denunciations, blackmail, doxxing as well as calls for violences.

Why Pakistani cyberstalker Ramla Akhtar does flee the regular course of justice?

There is large bunch of good reasons explaining why Ramla Akhtar the cyberstalker will never file a complaint with Pakistani judicial authorities despite her frequent allegations that she would -very-soon- proceed accordingly. Her repeated invocations should better be understood as a despicable, and largely debunked, mean of pressure against her victims. It is also a rhetoric sophism for deceiving an audience which, actually, left long time ago.

The hatred on-line campaign started, two years and a half ago, by the Pakistani Ramla Akhtar reached none of its goal. Though she tried all that she could, and dedicated most of her days and nights to this endeavour, she was unable to find a method for breaking the prophylactic lockdown built around her. It is obvious Ms Ramla Akhtar persistently overestimated her capacity of nuisance, despite her impressive outstanding efforts in that direction. The sanctions she originated and the repeated failure of her attempts have an inflating destructive impact on her life, on her image, on her credentials, on her self-confidence and on her mental health. Except for a deeply rooted suicidal addiction and for the need to embed extra victims in her end, there is no explanation about why Ms Ramla Akhtar rejected the generous offer of August 2021, which could have made possible for her to honorably close this case and to come back to the normal real life.

Why Pakistani Ramla Akhtar rejected the generous offer she got for stopping the unsucessfull campaign ruining her life?

The hatred on-line campaign started, two years and a half ago, by the Pakistani Ramla Akhtar reached none of its goal. Though she tried all that she could, and dedicated most of her days and nights to this endeavour, she was unable to find a method for breaking the prophylactic lockdown built around her. It is obvious Ms Ramla Akhtar persistently overestimated her capacity of nuisance, despite her impressive outstanding efforts in that direction.
The sanctions she originated and the repeated failure of her attempts have an inflating destructive impact on her life, on her image, on her credentials, on her self-confidence and on her mental health. Except for a deeply rooted suicidal addiction and for the need to embed extra victims in her end, there is no explanation about why Ms Ramla Akhtar rejected the generous offer of August 2021, which could have made possible for her to honorably close this case and to come back to the normal real life.

Loading…

Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create your website with WordPress.com
Get started
%d bloggers like this: