Why Pakistani cyberstalker Ramla Akhtar does flee the regular course of justice?

There is large bunch of good reasons explaining why Ramla Akhtar the cyberstalker will never file a complaint with Pakistani judicial authorities despite her frequent allegations that she would -very-soon- proceed accordingly. Her repeated invocations should better be understood as a despicable, and largely debunked, mean of pressure against her victims. It is also a rhetoric sophism for deceiving an audience which, actually, left long time ago.

Invoking law and the “course of justice” is a regular sophism of Ms Ramla Akhtar’s attacks

Ms Ramla Akhtar did not and will never make the mistake of filing any complaint

  1. Ramla Akhtar’s accusations are false ones. She is unable to document them.
  2. Ramla Akhtar is scared being in troubles because of the testimonies relating to her child abuse.
  3. Ramla Akhtar is afraid of being convicted for her actual cybercrimes documented in the complaint filed at Pakistan Federal investigation agency.
  4. Ramla Akhtar’s calumnious denunciations she tweeted to Pakistani law enforcement are, actually, outrage to justice and might be convicted.
  5. Gulmit villagers can be witnesses about the physical violences Ramla Akhtar exercised against, at least, one elderly man. Villagers anger pushed her to flee Gojal and leave Hunza.
  6. Ramla Akhtar can be sentenced for her adulterous relationship with a married man. (Punishment for adultery or fornication is up to ten years in prison, thirty lashes with a whip and a fine of an indeterminate amount in Pakistan)
  7. Ramla Akhtar can be under blasphemy conviction as an analysis of her Twitter or Facebook posts might reveal.
  8. Ramla Akhtar was already arrested by police in northern Pakistan. She does not want a new confrontation.

All of this is probably mixed in Ms Ramla Akhtar mind. However, as matter of fact, the most advanced legal complaint (for terrorism) project revealed by Ms Ramla Akhtar, against the French Bernard Grua, was not supposed to be filed by her, but by Ms Olga Leonidovna Ozerova, a Russian citizen, with the help of 10 false witnesses.

Save on Pinterest

There is large bunch of good reasons explaining why Ramla Akhtar the cyberstalker will never file a complaint with Pakistani judicial authorities despite her frequent allegations that she would -very-soon- proceed accordingly. Her repeated invocations should better be understood as a despicable, and largely debunked, mean of pressure against her victims. It is also a rhetoric sophism for deceiving an audience which, actually, left long time ago.
Pin it

Published by Bernard Grua

Graduated from Paris "Institut d'Etudes Politiques", financial auditor, photographer, founder and spokesperson of the worldwide movement which opposed to the delivery of Mitral invasion vessels to Putin's Russia, contributor to French and foreign media for culture, heritage and geopolitics.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create your website with WordPress.com
Get started
%d bloggers like this: