Ms Olga Leonidovna Ozerova, aka Olga Sim (Ольга Сим), a travel agent, acting under the name of “Extreme Travels in Russia” (Экстремальные путешествия), ” Russian Extreme Travels” or “Trekking in Altai”, operating in Pakistan, sent a threat and blackmail message to the French photographer, blogger and media contributor Bernard Grua. We will explain why her harassing and insulting allegations, presented in outrageous words are fake-news and blatant lies motivated by hatred with a wish to harm. They are part of a despicable plan of action which, if fully applicated, would be an additional human rights violation and would moreover constitute, in a state of law, a contempt of court punishable by fine or imprisonment.
To know what are Russian Extreme Travels (Экстремальные путешествия) and Olga Leonidovna Ozerova, aka Olga Sim (Ольга Сим), follow this link: “Extreme Travels”, a Russian tour company entering troubled and choppy waters, in Pakistan, after morally and legally questionable compromises.
What is Ms Olga Leonidovna Ozerova’s threat and blackmail, how it will be answered
Threat and blackmail
Read carefully, a RUSSIAN citizen threatens a FRENCH citizen of complaining against him for TERRORISM in PAKISTAN. Moreover, she threatens to launch 10 agitators and false witnesses after him.
Read Bernard Grua’s slamming answer to this blackmailer.
Olga Leonidovna Ozerova, aka Olga Sim (Ольга Сим), allegations are mostly copies of Ramla Akhtar, aka Rmala Aalam, unsupported accusations, that the last one endless shares since more than one year and a half. They have been repeatedly answered and proved as malevolent lies. However, for the new readers, some explanations will be given here. To be totally transparent, it must be told that this paper is also intended to be sent to Pakistani authorities if the stalking partners, Ozerova and Akhtar, decided to bring their false testimonies to them.
We will not review all the defamation, the calumnious denunciations, the harassment methods, the toxic manipulations, the provocations, the insults and the false information produced by Ms Akhtar against her local or foreign victims. Even a book, whose most of the chapters are already written, would not be enough. We will just focus on the three hoaxes listed by Olga Leonidovna Ozerova, aka Olga Sim (Ольга Сим) because they have already been cooked and detailed by her Pakistani partner, who can’t refrain herself of flooding social media with a morbid exhibitionism.
For the same reasons, we will not try to determine, here, the reasons which might explain why a Russian citizen decided to instrument the authorities of a third part country against a French citizen living in France. This is done in another other article: “Extreme Travels in Russia (Trekking in Altai) and all Olga Sim’s steps leading to blackmail and Contempt of Court in Pakistan“.
However, more details are already available with a simple Google search knowing that additional information can always be asked to Bernard Grua. They will be given with documented evidences.
Confronting Ms Olga Leonidovna Ozerova’s allegations with evidences from her victim, with the ideology of hatred and violence of her stalking partner, with her own contradictions and inconsistencies.
1. A foreigner interferig into private life of PK citizens. Such as distributing info to Gojal people about private matters. Making groups and movements within certain PK people against another PK personOlga Leonidovna Ozerova – Threat and blackmail message
“Foreigner”: Remember that Ms Olga Leonidovna Ozerova, aka Olga Sim (Ольга Сим) the woman who writes this, is Russian citizen, a foreigner in Pakistan. Remember there are also 1,526 public defamation and calumnious denunciations (most of them to French authorities and Nantes municipality where lives the victim) posted on Twitter against a foreigner, the French Bernard Grua, by a Pakistani stalker.This is not local. This is global.
Involving, from the beginning, foreigners in her attacks against a local community was Ms Ramla Akhtar own decision. Using it as a manipulative sophism or expressing regrets for this wrong choice does not enter into consideration.
“Private life of PK citizens“ and “Private matters” Except this ultimatum from Ozerova, nothing shared by Bernard Grua was private, unless conversations were previously quoted by one of the two accomplices. Ms Ozerova perfectly knows how her stalking partner uses private conversation for partial and false quotes, hiding her harassing provocations and insults or rewriting what her victim communicated to her. Sharing private conversation is the policy that Akhtar self attributed to herself. She invokes it is a Pakistani rule.
Akhtar not only shares privates conversations she had with someone. She also shares PUBLICLY and REPETEADLY, on Facebook and on Twitter a private and family conversation she stole from the computer or (more likely) from the phone of her main Wakhi victim.
Red modifications have been made by Akhtar. Green underlines and notes were made by Bernard Grua who also blurred the ID and the hashtags not related to him. There is no need to add defamation to Akhtar’s defamation (still available on Akhtar’s Twitter account). This is something to review in detail to understand Akhtar’s methods aprpoved by the Russian Olga Leonidovna Ozerova, her accomplice.
- See that Akhtar’s Twitter ID and Twitter name impersonating Bernard Grua’s name.
- Note the hashtags for enforcing the malevolence.
- Try to understand what means “tortured by @BernardGrua“ who (Thanks God!) never met with Akhtar and was, once, in Pakistan, two years and a half ago.
- Please find the “deranged youth” led by Grua. Or, at least, any even minimalist indication of the existence of such a group.
- Please, observe that the young person laughs, confirms she is from the family and says she is kidding. For Ramla Akhtar, this is the “evidence” (the only one), she can produce against a Wakhi gentleman from Chapursan she endless accuses of being a “pedophile“, a “rapist” and “conman“, with the support of Grua.
“Distributing info to Gojal people”… “Making groups and movements”. There is no hidden conspiracy. Managing a coordinated and common answer would certainly have been of great help. But there are, unfortunately, no “groups” and no “movements”. Those which are referred to, here, are the 2,700 readers and the 66 comments of the report checking the plethoric allegations about a sexual conspiracy between the Wakhi people of Upper Hunza and their foreign visitors. These accusations were publicly posted on Facebook by Ms Ramla Akhtar. Alert was given by local people who cannot enjoy the same freedom of speech than the French one.
Let’s read the blackmail of Ms Olga Leonidovna Ozerova about “her group” or agitators and false witnesses, external to Huna. The threat is repeated twice in her short message.
…i am opening a case against you… with the support of my PK friends who are both from GB and KPK… i will open the case, with at least 10 PK citizens signing, with the aim of putting you into a black list of Pakistan, when you will not be able to travel to Pakistan ever again. Hope this is clear.Olga Leonidovna Ozerova – Threat and blackmail message
It is clear. A Russian citizen cosiders she could decide who is allowed or not to enter Pakistan. After “Kрым наш” comes “Пакистан наш”. But, “Natasha”, Russia in Pakistan is nothing. China is all.
2. Religious assault, you multiple sentences about “a Sunni girl attacking peaceful Ismaili comunity” – this comes to the subject of antiterrorist law of PKOlga Leonidovna Ozerova – Threat and blackmail message
“A Sunni girl“ – This is a false quote. Ms Ramla Akhtar was and is never mentioned as “a Sunni girl“. She is mentioned as a radicalized or a fanatic Sunni or Muslim person or woman. The problem is, of course, not the religion. The probleme is the radical or fanatic use Akhtar makes from her sect, and its followers, for preaching hatred against her victims. This is a fact that Ms Ramla Akhtar is instrumenting Sunni fundamentalism against all of her targets since the very beginning of her attacks. The more her words are false, the more she invokes the Almighty. She uses accusations of blasphemy against her victims. She knows that blasphemy equals to death sentence in her country. She endless presents herself as a Muslim victim of a foreigner on Twitter, including in her “anonymous” profile. This can be observed in her Facebook public posts collected here, here and here. It can also be observed on numerous of her 14,200 Tweets (2,300 Tweets on @CopingWithCovid and 11,900 tweets on @GruaAbuseArkive). The radicalization of Ms Akhtar speech is explained in this case study – Pakistan, extremism as a consequence of retardation or as a modernity crisis?
A French version was published on Agoravox a public media, one year ago – Pakistan : l’extrémisme comme conséquence de l’arriération ou comme crise de la modernité ? It got 2,296 readers and 71 comments.
In France it is not politically correct to argue with people, based on religions or ethnicities. That’s why this issue was not cared properly, until the bloody Islamist attacks of September, October and November 2020. However, without prejudging the causes of Ms Akhtar’s Muslim argument it is possible to guess that presenting herself as a Muslim woman, martyr of a French citizen, is done for broadening her fight, gaining supporters and initiating harassment in pack, with potential fatal consequences for her targets. She does the same usage of hot trends such as #MeToo, environment, anti-colonialism, Black Lives Matter, People of Color, social entreprise, poverty, disasters, Covid19, rape, children condition, women condition, paedophilia, education, suicide etc. in accordance with her “social media model”. Even Samuel Paty’s mourning in Nantes was an opportunity for spamming the town authorities with her slanderings. Every time, Akhtar tries to hijack the audience of these causes, for her own profit, own rants and own targets. There, she stages herself as an “actionist” (“hyper-activist” according to her words) customizing the fictionnal narrative of her life for grabbing an iconical status of the cause she pretends being involved in. She dumps these causes as soon as they are not “in the mood” any more.
As a consequence, let’s be clear. Notwithstanding the fact she says being involved in spiritualism and black magic (part of the medical consultancies she sells), we will not ascertain that Ms Akhtar is an actual Sunni follower. Knowing also that on some of her numerous Facebook pages, she pretends to be a dragon but also a saint, a prophet and a shaman… This just depends on the audience she targets and the kind of pulsions she wants to tease.
Ms Akhtar religion (if any) is highly questionable. In no way, it is alleged, here, that she is actually representing Muslim people, and more precisely Sunni believers, as already explained by this external testimony received as early as July 7, 2019.
However, as a matter of fact, the way Ms Akhtar fuels religious hatred cannot be ignored by anybody who tries to address her malevolence. Here below are a few examples of her Twitter profile and posts under changing ID’s such as @BarefootRamster, @BarefootRara, @Barefoot_rmala, @CopingWithCovid, @GruaAbuseArkive.
This blackmail received from Russian Olga Leonidovna Ozerova is the demonstration on how Sunni Islam can be radicaly instrumented for threat purposes by someone who does not even belong to Pakistan and to the Muslim world. This is consistent with the way her stalking partner hijacks Muslim religion for hatred.
“attacking” – This is factual and this is the correct word for Ms Ramla Akhtar’s numerous posts like the following one.
“Peaceful Ismaili comunity“ – It is an evidence largely agreed that Ismaili people of Upper Hunza are peaceful ones. This is one of the reasons why they are shown as a window by Pakistan promoting its tourism. See HistoryPak.com: “Situated at the northwest of Hunza river at an altitude of 3000 feet (2440 meters above sea level) lays the valley of Hunza. In Pakistan this valley is known as the heaven on earth but it is pronounced by many writers as “land of peace””.
These are also the words of Ms Olga Leonidovna Ozerova, aka Olga Sim, on her website. БЛОГ О ПАКИСТАНЕ Путевые заметки Ольги Сим (Blog About Pakistan – Olga Sim’s travel notes):
Жители Хунзы – горцы, со светлой по сравнению с южанами-пенджабцами кожей. Но главное – заметные с первого взгляда доброта и теплота, излучающие от всех людей. Нет в них и намека на холодность и хитрость горожан.Olga Leonidovna Ozerova, aka Olga Sim – Blog About Pakistan
(The inhabitants of the Hunza are highlanders, with light skin compared to the southerners-Punjabis. But the main thing is the kindness and warmth, noticeable at first sight, radiating from all people. There is not even a hint of coldness and cunning in them. – Olga Leonidovna Ozerova )
Так же как и ваханцы, бур\иши исповедают исмаилистский ислам, который наименее строгий из всех видов ислама. Именно поэтому в Хунзе можно часто увидеть женщин с непокрытой головой, самостоятельных женщин, имеющих работу, а также, поскольку в исмаилизме делается особый упор на образование, эти горцы имеют самое высокое процентное соотношение образованного населения в Пакистане по сравнению с другими народностями.Olga Leonidovna Ozerova, aka Olga Sim – Blog About Pakistan
(Like the Wakhis, the Burushaskis practice Ismaili Islam, which is the least strict of all forms of Islam. This is why bareheaded women are often seen in Hunza, independent women with jobs, and because of the emphasis on education in Ismailism, these highlanders have the highest percentage of educated people in Pakistan compared to other peoples. – Olga Leonidovna Ozerova)
Now, the same person writes that this kind of statement “comes to the subject of antiterrorist law of PK“.
3. Supporting separatist movement of HunzaOlga Leonidovna Ozerova – Threat and blackmail message
None of Bernard Grua’s articles about Hunza, presented here: High Asia, stories of the Karakoram, promote separatism. Nobody, except Akhtar and nowadays her accomplice Ozerova, made such a strange allegation. On the opposite, these texts have been complimented by people from different parts of Pakistan, including Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad & Peshawar. Two of them have also been published on Pakistani media such as “Pamir Times” and “Passu Times”. Actually, and it is probably the only added value of Ms Ozerova, the idea of separatism was given, as early as June 2019, by her to Ms Ramla Akhtar. After Crimea annexation, Russian law charges “separatism” with the same condemnations than “terrorism”. Remember also that Kremlin took part in Syrian crimes against humanity (500 K casualties, millions of displaced people) in the name of anti-terrorism. It is because Russia first bombed non-jihadist rebels instead of Daesh that France and other Western states did not take part in its coalition. Despite the wish expressed on November 2015 by President François Hollande.
Since, thanks to Ozerova, her whisperer, the Pakistani stalker makes a large use of the separatism accusations, i.e. terrorism. To support her accusation, she shows a marketing segmentation Bernard Grua suggested in the article “Some reflections about the development of a responsible and community based tourism in Hunza Valley, Pakistan”. This is what is done in France, the first tourist country of the world, for the Alpes, for the Côte d’Azur, for the Pyrénées, for the Châteaux de la Loire, for Bittanny, etc. There is nothing political in this statement, just basic touristic common sense.
Presentation of Bernard Grua’s suggestion that Akhtar uses for supporting her separatism accusation.
A partial quote of the above chapter is repeatedly attached by Ms Ramla Akhtar for “evidencing” racism and separatism promotion from Bernard Grua.
Note the use of the word “secretly”. The “proof” it exist is because you have no evidence it exists.
The only attachment repeatedly posted by Rmala Akhtar “proving” Bernard Grua separatism in Hunza.
Olga Leonidovna Ozerova’s duplicity about “separatism”
We will not say that Olga Leonidovna Ozerova, aka Olga Sim (Ольга Сим) could also face the ridiculous accusation of separatism for the words, similar to Bernard Grua’s ones, she wrote. But, we can confirm she obviously tries to lure people and her hosting country authorities while using separatism allegations against a French contributor to Pakistani media such as “Passu Times” and “Pamir Times”.
Во всем горном Пакистане есть своя непередаваемая прелесть. Главное – это ощущение чистоты и красоты, которые возможно существовали на нашей планете более 100 лет назад. Почему они сохранились в Пакистане? Во-1-х, из-за удаленности мест от основных дорог цивилизации, во-2-х, благодаря политической изоляции и неправильном представлении об этой стране в мире сюда не приезжают толпы туристов и жители также оторваны от остального мира, благодаря чему сохранилась чистота и доброта и домашняя атмосфера среди жителей, которые видимо когда-то были характерны для всей Индии.Olga Leonidovna Ozerova, aka Olga Sim – Blog About Pakistan
(“All mountainous Pakistan has its own indescribable charm. The main thing is the feeling of purity and beauty that may have existed on our planet more than 100 years ago. Why did they survive in Pakistan? Firstly, due to the remoteness of places from the main roads of civilization, secondly, due to political isolation and a misconception about this country in the world, crowds of tourists do not come here and residents are also cut off from the rest of the world, thanks to which cleanliness has been preserved and the kindness and homely atmosphere among the inhabitants, which apparently were once characteristic of all India” – Olga Leonidovna Ozerova)
As it will be explained in a next article, an important part of Ms Olga Leonidovna Ozerova’s source of revenues is selling tours in the mountainous regions of Pakistan. “Segmentation” is part of her Russian business in this country. Basic “Segmentation” suggested by a French citizen, for the benefit of local populations, becomes “Separatism” and, de facto, “Terrorism” for her and her stalking partner.
It would not be surprising that the mentally instable Ramla Akhtar, haunted by her own rants and frustrations, believe in some parts of her self-toxic discourse. However, as shown by her own blog, Ms Olga Leonidovna Ozerova, aka Olga Sim (Ольга Сим), a travel operator dealing in Pakistan, knows what is the reality. She knows that the accusation she pretends she would deliver to Pakistani government are forgeries. Does she think she can lure the country authorities with such a scenario? This might even not be a relevant question. Her goal is to be part of a stalking campaign against a French citizen for doubtful reasons, while over-estimating the harm she could cause and wrongly assessing the consequences of this dishonest behavior will have on her reputation and the one of Russian Extreme Travels (“Экстремальные путешествия”), her little firm. She will understand she is wrong.
Next article to be published: what is Pakistan in Ms Olga Leonidovna Ozerova’s business?
Ms Ramla Akhtar continues her daily stalking against Bernard Grua with defamation and calumnious denunciations. Here below are some of her plethoric flood of Tweets showing, again, her “method”: calumnious denunciations to authorities, unsupported allegations, “evidences” provided as attachment, which are contrary to her words, and hijacking of other causes such as denouncing “white supremacism”. It is difficult to understand how “Экстремальные путешествия” (Extreme Travels in Russia) and Olga Leonidovna Ozerova, aka Ольга Сим (Olga Sim) could have decided to be involved in this “неккультурный” psychopathic scheme.
Calumnious denunciations to Pakistani authorities and media.
Hijacking another cause
Read the RFERL article from where comes this capture: “In Europe, Plenty Of Outrage — Just Not About Russia’s Actions In Ukraine“
The above Twitter publication of Ms Ramla Akhtar, aka Rmala Aalam, was posted, by Bernard Grua, on Facebook. It received the comments presented below. It is not said, here, that these allegations, coming from a normally reliable person, are true of false. As a matter of fact, Ramla Akhtar pretends frequently on Facebook and Twitter that she gets “information” about local people from Paskistani intelligence agencies. It must be recognized, also, that her profilic cyber criminality was never stopped by any authority. On the other hand, agents or even simple delators never mention their connections with secret services in any “normal” country. Pakistan is so different, everybody can makes his own opinion about the real status of this person spreading hate and distrust in Hunza. It could, however, explain part of the Ozerova-Akhtar’s case. Let’s conclude by one issue. Ms Ramla Akhtar cover activity, “Betterbonds“ herbal shop in Gulmit, is not real and does not give her revenues. She spends days and nights ranting on internet. Then, from where comes the money for her livelihood?
Names have been hidden for safety purposes and to avoid their use against anybody by the two accomplices, Ms Ozerova and Ms Akhtar.
Ramla Akhtar’s racist and colonialist vision of Gilgit Pakistan people
New forgery: Ramla Akhtar’s creates and quotes a conversation which never happened
Dear readers, now this is your turn, please comment and share!
If you find unacceptable that a RUSSIAN person dares to blackmail a FRENCH citizen with threatening him of complaint for TERRORISM to the PAKISTANI government, if you consider a Russian citizen threatening of launching Pathan agitators behind a French citizen is insane, please share this article.
Do not hesitate to comment below with your name or anonymously if you want to give your opinion, if you have any relevant information about Ms Olga Leonidovna Ozerova‘s potential connections with Pakistani criminal and jihadist networks or if you want to get more information about the two accomplices, Ms Akhtar and Ms Olga Leonidovna Ozerova, aka Ольга Сим (Olga Sim)
All comments will receive a reply.
Follow on Facebook: Russian Extreme Travels – Экстремальные Путешествия
Many thanks in advance.
Save the “Maskirovka” debunking on Pinterest
Use of the public pictures from Olga Leonidovna Ozerova, aka Olga Sim from “Extreme Travels”:
« In many countries, certain uses of copyright-protected works do not infringe the copyright owner’s rights. For example, in the United States, copyright rights are limited by the doctrine of « fair use, » under which certain uses of copyrighted material for, but not limited to, criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research may be considered fair. U.S. judges determine whether a fair use defense is valid according to four factors, which are listed here for educational purposes. In some other countries, there is a similar concept called « fair dealing » that may be applied differently.«
This article on social media
On Pinterest and Flickr
Olga Leonidovan Ozerova’s video on Facebook
The only reason for embedding this video, here, is to push it in SERP in place of the one leading to Olga Leonidovna Ozerova’s Facebook page